Continuity and coordination of care for childhood cancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions: Results from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

AI Summary

The study focused on continuity and coordination of care for childhood cancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions. A survey was conducted among participants with two or more chronic conditions to assess perceived continuity of care from multiple clinicians. The results showed that care discontinuity is prevalent among childhood cancer survivors, with younger survivors more likely to report discontinuity. Seeing a main provider for fewer years was associated with a higher risk of discontinuity, while having a cancer specialist as a main provider was associated with lower discontinuity. Better scores on care coordination summary measures were linked to less prevalent discontinuity. The study concluded that care discontinuity among childhood cancer survivors is widespread and requires intervention.

Abstract

Introduction

Continuity and coordination-of-care for childhood cancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions are understudied but critical for appropriate follow-up care.

Methods

From April through June 2022, 800 Childhood Cancer Survivor Study participants with two or more chronic conditions (one or more severe/life-threatening/disabling) were emailed the “Patient Perceived Continuity-of-Care from Multiple Clinicians” survey. The survey asked about survivors’ main (takes care of most health care) and coordinating (ensures follow-up) provider, produced three care-coordination summary scores (main provider, across multiple providers, patient–provider partnership), and included six discontinuity indicators (e.g., having to organize own care). Discontinuity (yes/no) was defined as poor care on one or more discontinuity item. Chi-square tests assessed associations between discontinuity and sociodemographics. Modified Poisson regression models estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) for discontinuity risk associated with the specialty and number of years seeing the main and coordinating provider, and PRs associated with better scores on the three care-coordination summary measures. Inverse probability weights adjusted for survey non-participation.

Results

A total of 377 (47%) survivors responded (mean age 48 years, 68% female, 89% non-Hispanic White, 78% privately insured, 74% ≥college graduate); 147/373 (39%) reported discontinuity. Younger survivors were more likely to report discontinuity (chi-square p = .02). Seeing the main provider ≤3 years was associated with more prevalent discontinuity (PR; 95%CI) (1.17; 1.02-1.34 vs ≥ 10 years). Cancer specialist main providers were associated with less prevalent discontinuity (0.81; 0.66–0.99 vs. primary care). Better scores on all three care-coordination summary measures were associated with less prevalent discontinuity: main provider (0.73; 0.64–0.83), across multiple providers (0.81; 0.78–0.83), patient–provider partnership (0.85; 0.80–0.89).

Conclusions

Care discontinuity among childhood cancer survivors is prevalent and requires intervention.

Leave a Reply